Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Spriggs

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1931No. Appeal 52PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

' This appeal is from the action of the lower court in sustaining-an award in á workmen’s compensation case and involves one question: Was the testimony sufficient to show a causal relation between the accident and the death?

The learned court below comprehensively stated the underlying facts, as follows: “The deceased was a carpenter and an employee of appellant. On April 24, 1928, he and two other carpenters were engaged as employees of appellant in the laying of a floor at the Hilisview Sanitarium, at Washington, Pa. About lunch time, at 11:55 a. m., the deceased had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Clark v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Davis v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Tabuteau v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Florig v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Royko v. Logan Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Marshall v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Henry v. Lit Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API