McCoy v. Spriggs
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
' This appeal is from the action of the lower court in sustaining-an award in á workmen’s compensation case and involves one question: Was the testimony sufficient to show a causal relation between the accident and the death?
The learned court below comprehensively stated the underlying facts, as follows: “The deceased was a carpenter and an employee of appellant. On April 24, 1928, he and two other carpenters were engaged as employees of appellant in the laying of a floor at the Hilisview Sanitarium, at Washington, Pa. About lunch time, at 11:55 a. m., the deceased had…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Clark v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Davis v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tabuteau v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Florig v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Royko v. Logan Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Marshall v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Henry v. Lit Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.