Legal Opinion

Clark v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1919No. Appeal, No. 296PublishedCited by 58 opinions

Appeal, No. 296, Jan. T., 1919, bv plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., May T., 1917, No. 811, dismissing appeal from Workmen’s Com pensation Board reversing an award of a referee in favor of a claimant in case of Bridget Clark v. Lehigh Valley Coal Company. Appeal from decision of Workmen’s Compensation Board. The court dismissed the appeal. Claimant appealed. Error assigned was the judgment dismissing the ap peal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moschzisker,

Bridget Clark, widow of Patrick Clark, sought compensation for the death of her husband; the referee found in her favor, but the Workmen’s Compensation Board reversed; the Common Pleas of Luzerne County affirmed the board, and claimant has appealed to this court.

The referee reported, inter alia, as follows: “The testimony in this case shows that Patrick Clark, the claimant’s husband, was employed by defendant company in looking after a line of pipe used for the purpose of conveying silt from the surface into its mine; his duties were to keep that line in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Dainty v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Monahan v. Seeds & DurhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Patrick v. J. B. Ham Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API