Legal Opinion

Henry v. Lit Bros.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1960No. Appeal, No. 213PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

This is a -workmen’s compensation case. The Referee found that claimant was totally disabled as the result of an injury by accident while in the course of his employment, and made an award. The Workmen’s Compensation Board and the Court of Common Pleas affirmed. The employer and its insurance carrier have appealed. The factual situation appears in the following excerpt from the well-considered opinion of Judge Alexander of the court below:

“Claimant was employed by defendant, Lit Brothers, a retail department store at Eighth and Market Streets, Philadelphia ... as a porter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rybitski v. LebowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Haas v. Brotherhood of Transportation WorkersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. McCoy v. SpriggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Dunphy v. Augustinian College of VillanovaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Spry v. PoltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Tatrai v. Presbyterian University HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Tate v. GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Feaster v. S. K. Kelso & SonsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Self v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API