McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Simpson,
Defendant admits the verdict conclusively determines defendant was guilty of negligence, resulting in plaintiff’s injury, and that she was not contributorily negligent. The court below sustained a verdict in her favor, and defendant appeals, alleging the judgment should be reversed because of certain trial errors affecting the items of damages which might be included in the recovery.
It appears that, some seven weeks after the accident, plaintiff became sick with lobar pneumonia, and was taken to a hospital for treatment. When the detailed evidence regarding the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Miller v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
3Cited by73 opinions
- Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Wilhelm v. State of Maryland Traffic Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.