Legal Opinion

Davis v. Davis

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1923No. Appeal, No. 122PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The court below sustained the award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board and entered judgment in favor of the claimant. Appellant asks for a reversal on two grounds: (1) Because the medical experts failed to testify that in their professional opinion the claimant’s disability not only could, but also most probably did, result from the cause alleged. (2) Because the board, on the hearing de novo, did not hear the evidence of the *345witnesses, but tbeir testimony, by direction of tbe board, was taken before a referee.'(1) Tbe first ground is based on tbe ruling of tbe Supreme…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Stahl v. Watson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Clark v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Sullivan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Zimmerman v. WeinrothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Witt v. Witt's Food Mkt. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Washko v. Ruckno, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Tabuteau v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Florig v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API