Legal Opinion

Tabuteau v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1944No. Appeal, 156PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This is. an action in assumpsit upon an accident insurance policy issued to plaintiff by defendant. The policy provides that certain weekly payments would be made for total disability accidentally sustained, and certain lesser payments for partial disability, if the insured be disabled by accidental injuries “to the extent that he is unable to perform one or more important daily duties pertaining to his occupation.” Plaintiff claims that he accidentally sustained personal injuries, consisting of a double incomplete inguinal hernia, which totally disabled him from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Anderson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Davis v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Grossman v. BarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Simmons v. MullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Albert v. AlterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Montgomery v. Bazaz-SehgalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Montuori v. Narragansett Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API