Legal Opinion
Clay v. Teach
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 18, 1995No. 13437PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The plaintiff Martin Hayre1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after a jury verdict for the defendants on the issue of damages. Summary judgment had previously been granted in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of liability. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly refused to set aside the verdict as inconsistent. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*558The following facts form the basis of this appeal. The plaintiff brought this action to recover for injuries received in a motor vehicle accident. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Riccio v. AbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Freshwater v. BoothWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
- Ginsberg v. FusaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Rubin v. RiosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Melfi v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Macy v. LucasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Bostic v. SoucyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- DiBartolomeo v. HillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.