Legal Opinion
Melfi v. City of Danbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 2, 2002No. AC 21134PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiffs, Nicolas G. Melfi, Donna Melfi, Joseph Kozak and Dian Kozak, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant city of Danbury (city). On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) ordered the first four *681counts of their complaint stricken, (2) dismissed count five and (3) failed to award damages after a hearing in damages. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to our disposition of this appeal. “In July, 1991, the defendants, Robert Lupi and Phyllis Lupi, purchased two adjoining…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Doe v. MarselleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Royce v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Doe v. MarselleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Ratner v. WillametzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Davenport v. QuinnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fidelity Bank v. KreniskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Justin LUND v. MILFORD HOSPITAL, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Mountview Plaza Associates Inc. v. World Wide Pet Supply, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- McManus v. RoggiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Tang v. Bou-FakhreddineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.