Freshwater v. Booth
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Neely, Justice:
This is a case about inadequate damages. The plaintiffs asserted that the damages were clearly too low in light of the evidence and requested that we reverse and remand on the question of damages alone, or in the alternative reverse and remand for a new trial on all issues. The defendants argued that the inadequate verdict was either a defendant’s verdict perversely expressed or, alternatively, a legitimate compromise verdict which was sufficiently in accord with the evidence to withstand appellate review.
This is the quintessential, crossing center line, automobile accident…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richmond v. CampbellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- Hall v. GrovesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
- King v. BittingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
- Biddle v. HaddixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
- Keiffer v. QueenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In Re State Public Building Asbestos LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Grove by and Through Grove v. MyersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Kaiser v. HensleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Fazio v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.