Legal Opinion
DiBartolomeo v. Hill
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 14, 1996No. 14413PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.
In this automobile negligence action, the plaintiff Jerry DiBartolomeo1 2appeals from the judgment of the trial court on the issue of damages for his loss of consortium claim. On appeal, he claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial or, in the alternative, for an additur, (2) refused to give a Sec-ondino2 charge as requested and (3) refused to admit into evidence the defendants’ answer to the complaint on the issue of credibility.
In the trial court proceedings, the defendants, Linwood Hill and Hertz Corporation, conceded liability…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Cummings v. Twin Tool Manufacturing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Lazaros v. City of West HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998