Legal Opinion
Bostic v. Soucy
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 6, 2004No. AC 23822PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendants, Lawrence Soucy and Francis Basile, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Derek Bostic, after the court denied their motion to set aside the jury’s verdict and for a new trial. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) refused to instruct the jury on apportionment and (2) instructed the jury that it must award nominal damages.1 We disagree with the defendants and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The background facts are not in dispute. In October, 1997, the defendants and the plaintiff were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bovat v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Raybeck v. Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Card v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Morrison v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Henriques v. MagnaviceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Right v. BreenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Right v. BreenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Green v. HNS MANAGEMENT CO., INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Farmer-Lanctot v. ShandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Sequenzia v. Guerrieri Masonry, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.