Legal Opinion
Ginsberg v. Fusaro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 27, 1993No. 14471PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
These appeals arise out of an action brought by the plaintiff dentists, Martin Ginsberg and Robert Miller, seeking to recover from the defendant Rita Fusaro1 the reasonable value of dental services rendered to her. Although the case started as a collection case, it developed into a dental malpractice case when Fusaro filed a counterclaim alleging that Ginsberg and Miller had been negligent in performing the dental services. The jury found the issues for Fusaro *422on both the complaint and the counterclaim, and awarded Fusaro $5000 damages against Miller and “zero” damages against Ginsberg. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Aillon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Palomba v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Blanchette v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.