Legal Opinion
Krietmeyer v. Hemphill
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1927No. 4952PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Circuit Judge.
The decree appealed from ordered the receiver of the Baldwin drainage district (herein called the district), a public corporation organized under the laws of Florida, out of moneys in his hand derived from taxes assessed upon lands in that district for the payment of interest, to pay first all of the past-due interest coupons in the order of their maturity, with 6 per cent, interest thereon, accruing on the bonds first issued by that District, dated J anuary 1, 1917, if the amount in his hands is sufficient for that purpose, and beginning with the interest coupons first…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kadow v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Texas Co. v. International & G. N. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
- Hoehler v. W. B. Worthen Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- McNear v. Little Red River Levee Dist. No. 2 of White CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Stillman v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pape v. St. Lucie Inlet District & Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Bostwick v. Baldwin Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Dant & Russell, Inc. v. J. D. Halstead Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Kreitmeyer v. Baldwin Drainage Dist.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1932
- Florida Nat. Bank v. HemphillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.