Legal Opinion

Hoehler v. W. B. Worthen Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1922PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

Road Improvement District No. 5 of Pulaski County was formed under a special statute (Acts 1909, p. 1151) for the purpose of improving a certain road. The statute authorized a levy of special taxes on assessed benefits for the purpose of paying for the improvement, and also authorized the commissioners to “borrow money no.t exceeding the estimated cost of the work, at a rate of interest not exceeding ten per centum per annum,” and to issue negotiable bonds for the discharge of liabilities created under the contract for constructing the improvement. The cost of the construction of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Penzel v. BrookmireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  2. First Nat. Bank of Abbeville v. Terry, Briggs Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners of McKinney Bayou Drainage District v. Board of Directors of Garland Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Krietmeyer v. HemphillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  3. Howe v. Long Prairie Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. In re Drainage Dist. No. 7District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1938
  5. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Franklin-American Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API