Legal Opinion

Kreitmeyer v. Baldwin Drainage Dist.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided December 30, 1932No. 309PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUM, District Judge.

By its petition of intervention filed herein March 24, 1930, a little more than a year after the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals in Hemphill v. Florida National Bank, 30 F.(2d) 892, Florida National Bank now seeks to recover from the receiver, as a claim prior to the claims of bondholders and other creditois, a balance in the sum of $5,-450, with interest, upon the obligation of the district to tiie hank originally in the sum of $13,750, evidenced by a warrant drawn by the district upon its treasurer payable to United States Trust Company and indorsed to tlie…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Board of Commissioners v. PlotnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Lowndes v. WicksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  5. Caflisch v. HumbleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grace Line, Inc., Libelant-Appellee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. Comer v. FistereDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Kirby Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1936
  4. Grace Line, Inc., Libelant-Appellee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  5. T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Kirby Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API