Legal Opinion
Pape v. St. Lucie Inlet District & Port Authority
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 22, 1935No. 7334PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, plaintiff below, a citizen of and resident in the state of Florida, is the holder of eighty-nine of the first issue bonds of the St. Lucie Inlet District, a Florida public corporation, created for the purpose of improving and maintaining the St. Lucie river as a waterway, by deepening it, and constructing and maintaining an inlet connecting its mouth with the Atlantic Ocean. Appellees are the Board of Commissioners of and the St. Lucie Inlet District and Port Authority, a public corporation created to take over, assume responsibility for, and levy, assess,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Fenner v. BoykinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baker v. Atchison, T. & S. F. RY. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Bradford v. HurtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Melton v. Railroad Commission of TexasDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1935
- Atlantic Pipe Line Co. v. State Tax BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1935
- Donna Irr. Dist. v. West Coast Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.