Legal Opinion
Dant & Russell, Inc. v. J. D. Halstead Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 3, 1939No. 8885PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of California by the J. D. Halstead Lumber Company, the defendant in a receivership suit, ordering the payment by the receiver of a dividend to the Halstead Company’s creditors.
*307The proceeding in which the order for the payment of the dividend was made, began on December 14, 1937, in the filing of a petition by the receiver setting forth the then condition of the estate and recommending the payment to the creditors of a sum equal to S percent of their claims. The petition further stated that,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ruggles v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
- Pennsylvania Co. for Ins. on Lives & Granting Annuities v. Philadelphia Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
- Krietmeyer v. HemphillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
- Gelberg v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Rubert Hermanos, Inc. v. People of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Johnson v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Dant & Russell, Inc. v. J. D. Halstead Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.