Ellis v. Roshei Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROSS, J. *
SUMMARY
In this appeal, we must determine whether Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 1 empowers the trial court to grant sanctions against an attorney who, on behalf of his client, demurs to a cross-complaint on grounds which are initially valid, but such validity evaporates upon opposing counsel’s concessions to all contentions raised by the demurrer. We hold that the trial court properly imposed sanctions on counsel for the demurring party under section 128.5 for “tactics or actions not based on good faith which are frivolous or which cause unnecessary delay.”
Proceedings…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- GHK Associates v. Mayer Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Cottle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Young v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- 580 Folsom Associates v. Prometheus Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. DouglasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.