Legal Opinion

People v. Mattson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1959No. Crim. 6328PublishedCited by 248 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

A jury found defendant guilty of three counts of issuing checks without sufficient funds (Pen. Code, § 476a) and found that he had suffered a prior conviction of felony. Defendant appeals from the ensuing judgment. As the sole ground for reversal he contends that an indigent defendant is entitled as a matter of constitutional and statutory right both to conduct his own defense and to be provided with the services of court-appointed counsel to advise and assist him in a subservient capacity in preparing for and during trial. We have concluded that the right to counsel does not include an…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by248 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

243 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API