Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1935No. S. F. 15280PublishedCited by 777 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff received in an action growing out of a collision between a locomotive operated by defendant company, and a truck operated by plaintiff. The major contention of defendants is that although the evidence clearly establishes their negligence, the evidence, as a matter of law, also establishes plaintiff’s contributory negligence.

In reviewing the evidence on such an appeal all conflicts must be resolved in favor of the respondent, and all legitimate and reasonable inferences indulged in to uphold the verdict if possible. It is an…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Baltimore & Potomac R. Co. v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. StegemeierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by777 opinions

  1. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

772 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API