580 Folsom Associates v. Prometheus Development Co.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENSON, J.
This action involves three separate appeals taken from the judgment entered in a single action in the trial court after that court entered summary adjudication of issues in favor of 580 Folsom Associates (Folsom) and against Prometheus Development Company (Prometheus). Appellant Folsom seeks costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in defending against a petition for writ of mandate filed in this court by Prometheus. Appellant Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison (Brobeck), trial counsel for Prometheus, seeks to overturn the trial court’s order which awarded sanctions jointly and severally…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Roth v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Distefano v. ForesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Scheiding v. Dinwiddie Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.