Bauguess v. Paine
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BIRD, C. J.
Appellant, plaintiff’s attorney in a personal injury suit, was ordered by the trial court to pay respondents $700 in attorney’s fees after a mistrial was declared in that action. This court must decide whether the trial court exceeded its authority in issuing that order.
I
Appellant, Maxim N. Bach, represented the plaintiff in the personal injury suit of Bauguess v. Paine. The trial proceeded uneventfully until the second day, when appellant proposed reading a deposition to the jury. Appellant requested that a diagram, attached to the deposition, be admitted into evidence.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.