Legal Opinion

Bauguess v. Paine

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1978No. S.F. 23764PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

Appellant, plaintiff’s attorney in a personal injury suit, was ordered by the trial court to pay respondents $700 in attorney’s fees after a mistrial was declared in that action. This court must decide whether the trial court exceeded its authority in issuing that order.

I

Appellant, Maxim N. Bach, represented the plaintiff in the personal injury suit of Bauguess v. Paine. The trial proceeded uneventfully until the second day, when appellant proposed reading a deposition to the jury. Appellant requested that a diagram, attached to the deposition, be admitted into evidence.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by167 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API