Legal Opinion

Harnischfeger Sales Corp. v. Coats

California Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1935No. Sac. 4958PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an action by plaintiff to recover the balance due on a conditional sale contract for the sale of a power shovel. Defendant answered and counterclaimed, setting up the defense of fraud. The jury brought in a verdict in favor of defendant on his counterclaim, in the sum of $2,500. The court, however, gave judgment for plaintiff notwithstanding the verdict, for the entire balance due on the contract. Defendant appealed.

The contract in this case was entered into after negotiations by defendant with plaintiff’s agent, and it is the false representations of this agent which constitute the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Speck v. WylieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Graham v. Los Angeles First National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Holtze v. HoltzeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Lozier v. Janss Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Curtis v. Title Guarantee and Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Herzog v. Capital Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Terminix Co. v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Coleman v. Ladd Ford Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Kalkruth v. Resort Properties, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. A. R. Koehler v. Lawrence EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API