Legal Opinion

Herzog v. Capital Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1945No. L. A. 19172PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

In June, 1938, defendants, acting through their local agent, Yakel, sold plaintiff a house in San Diego for $9,500, representing that it was in “sound condition” and “perfectly intact.” The house began to leak badly during a heavy rain in January, 1940, and a subsequent inspection disclosed that the leakage was due to the use of defective materials and improper bracing. This action for damages for alleged fraud in the sale of the house resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $3,500.

Defendants list several grounds which they contend require a reversal of the judgment. First,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API