Legal Opinion

Lozier v. Janss Investment Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1934No. L. A. 13857PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

As to defendant Janss Investment Company this is an action for the return of the consideration paid by plaintiffs on contracts to purchase certain real property in Los Angeles County, following a unilateral rescission accomplished prior to commencement of the action, upon a written notice and offer of restoration. As to defendants Ellis and Germann, it is an action for damages for fraud and deceit, as these defendants did not receive the consideration paid but did make the fraudulent representations complained of.

The facts are that plaintiffs executed five contracts of purchase with defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Speck v. WylieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Herzog v. Capital Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Scroggin v. WorthyWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Curtis v. Title Guarantee and Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Greenberg v. Du Bain Realty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Harnischfeger Sales Corp. v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API