Legal Opinion
Medley v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1930No. Docket No. 84PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal, made and entered after a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint had been sustained, without leave to amend.
The action was one against the sheriff of the county of Tulare, seeking to recover certain damages, together with the statutory penalty provided for in section 693 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the alleged negligence of the defendant sheriff in failing to give proper notice of sale, as required by section 692 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in connection with the sale of certain lots previously sold under a writ of execution and purchased…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Lambert v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People ex rel. Dunn v. MeloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Paige v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Scafidi v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Walker v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Moonie v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.