Legal Opinion

Moonie v. Lynch

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1967No. Civ. 23787PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J. *

Defendant appeals from judgment dismissing a cross-complaint for alleged malpractice of an accountant, after demurrer sustained without leave to amend on ground that the alleged cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations.

Question Presented

Does the statute of limitations in an action for alleged malpractice by an accountant start to run from the alleged negligent act, from discovery of the negligence, or from the date when defendant was notified of the income tax penalty assessment ?

May 15, 1963, plaintiff David L. Moonie, a certified public accountant, filed an action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Walker v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. L. B. Laboratories, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Wood v. CurreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API