Legal Opinion

Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of Education

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1963No. L. A. No. 26280PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

We hold here that neither the statute of limitations nor laches bars plaintiff Lerner’s right to reinstatement as a permanent teacher in the Los Angeles City High School District. That board’s automatic termination of his certificate rested exclusively on the state board’s revocation under Education Code section 12756. Ultimately the state board reversed its action as illegal under court decision. The interval of time so involved covered a period, commencing with the original termination by the city board, greater than *386that of the applicable statute of limitations. Since Lerner, however,…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Collier v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API