Scafidi v. Western Loan & Building Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ATTERIDGE, J. pro tem.
Plaintiffs’ appeal is from a judgment on the pleadings entered by the trial court on motion of the defendants.
The basic cause of action which plaintiffs attempted to plead in their complaint appears to be that form of assumpsit denominated as “money had and received,” but both in the trial court and before this reviewing court they contend otherwise and take the position that theirs is in essence an action for fraud and deceit. If the action is of the first ascribed classification it must be held, as the trial court found, to have been barred by the statute of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Horn v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Buckland v. Threshold Enterprises, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2007
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.