Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Dunn v. Melone

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1887No. 20313PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

— Respondent was secretary of state for the term of four years ending December, 1875. It was his duty as such officer to collect and pay over to the state monthly the fees received by him. On the 1st of July, 1886, the relator, as controller, demanded of him that he account for and pay into the state treasury the sum of $11,109.50, alleged to have been received by him while in office, but for which it was claimed he had failed to account or make settlement with the controller, as required by law. Respondent taking no notice of this *575demand, the controller proceeded to state an account under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Piller v. S. Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lambert v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. Kings County Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API