Paige v. Carroll
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the defendants in the Superior Court of the County of Merced. Marks, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Sharpstein, J.:
This action was brought against a Sheriff and his sureties upon his official bond to recover damages which the plaintiff alleges that he has sustained by reason of the seizure and sale of certain personal property by said Sheriff under a writ of attachment against the property of one Anderson. The allegation is, that the property was taken and carried away on the eighth day of August, 1876. This action was commenced on the twentieth day of January, 1880, after a lapse of more than three years after the alleged cause of action arose. The complaint was demurred to, and the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Lambert v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- City of Butte v. GoodwinMontana Supreme Court · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.