Legal Opinion

State v. Denny

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1978No. 105PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

By his first assignment of error defendant contends the trial court erred by refusing to permit him to ask the following questions of prospective jurors:

“Mr. WILSON [defense attorney]: Would you be willing to be tried by one in your present state of mind if you were on trial in this case?

The COURT: That question is improper. You may not ask it.

Mr. WILSON: Searching your mind as you would want the mind of a juror to be searched if you were on trial in this case, can you think of any reason why you would not want a juror with your present state of mind to hear this case?

THE…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. StegmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. GappinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. PeekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API