State v. Peek
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
By his first assignment of error, defendant contends the trial judge prejudicially erred in his instructions to the jury when the jury foreman told him the jury was having trouble reaching a unanimous verdict. We do not agree.
The jury began its deliberations at 11:55 a.m. and continued until 12:35 p.m. when the court recessed for lunch. After having resumed deliberations at 2:00 p.m., the jury returned to the courtroom at 3:13 p.m. at which time the following transpired:
THE COURT: Ms. Morton, you’re carrying the verdict sheet, I take it from that you’re the foreperson.
Ms.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. YsaguireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. FernandezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. BogleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.