Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1975No. 46PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Before pleading, defendant moved to quash the bills of indictment on grounds that the death penalty as applied in this State violates the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. After verdict he moved to arrest judgment on similar grounds. Denial of both motions constitutes defendant’s first assignment of error.

Under this assignment defendant argues (1) that he was denied due process because the death penalty was applied to him in an arbitrary, capricious, subjective and selective manner due to freakish exercise of prosecutorial…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API