State v. Miller
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
This Court has said many times that upon a motion for judgment of nonsuit in a prosecution for a criminal offense, the evidence must be interpreted in the light most favorable to the State, and all reasonable inferences favorable to the State must be drawn from it. State v. Bridgers, 267 N.C. 121, 147 S.E. 2d 555; State v. Roux, 266 N.C. 555, 146 S.E. 2d 654; Strong, N. C. Index, Criminal Law, § 99. Ordinarily, the credibility of witnesses and the proper weight to be given their testimony is to be determined by the jury, not by the court upon a motion for judgment of nonsuit. State v. Orr,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Tysinger v. Coble Dairy ProductsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. . SigmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.