Legal Opinion

Wurzburger v. Nellis

California Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1913No. L.A. No. 2965PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting a new trial. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff, Bessie Currier Wurzburger, was injured by a fall into a gully or wash which traversed a portion of a public road in Los Angeles County. The accident occurred in the evening after 8 o ’clock while Mrs. Wurzburger was proceeding along the road. Mrs. Wurzburger testified that she walked along the sidewalk to a point where it ended abruptly. She stepped down a few inches to the ground, and, thinking that she was traversing a cross street, proceeded three or four steps, when her foot struck the edge of one of the boards by which, as she expressed it, “the wash was banked up,” and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Morgan v. J. W. Robinson Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Edwards v. BrockwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Merritt v. McFarlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API