Legal Opinion
Merritt v. McFarland
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1906No. Civ. No. 254PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. A. Purington, Purington & Adair, and C. L. McFarland, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtGray, P. J.
This action is brought against the city of Riverside, a city of the sixth class, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained while the plaintiff was walking along Locust street by falling over an embankment at the intersection of Locust and Seventh streets in said city. The action is brought against the superintendent of streets of said city, the sureties on his official bond, and the city trustees of said city. Plaintiff had a verdict and judgment. The defendants appeal from the said judgment.
It is contended on behalf of the defendant, the superintendent of streets, T. K. Seburn, that…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Wurzburger v. NellisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Airways Water Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Edwards v. BrockwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Dobbins v. City of ArcadiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Faus v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967