Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Brockway

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1911No. Civ. No. 970PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to recover damages for personal ini juries alleged to have been sustained by reason of official negligence of defendant Brockway, who at the time was superintendent of streets of the city of San Diego, the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company being impleaded as a party defendant under an allegation that it was surety upon his official bond.

Judgment went against both defendants, from which the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company alone prosecutes this appeal.

It appears that at the time of the injury to plaintiff, defendant Brockway was the duly appointed, qualified and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Merritt v. McFarlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Pigeon Point Ranch, Inc. v. PerotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Dillwood v. RiecksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Wurzburger v. NellisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API