Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Sather

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1947No. 7380PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYATT, Justice.

Respondents brought actions, consolidated for trial, against appellants for damages for injuries to their persons and motor vehicle received from a nighttime collision of said vehicle with a stock pile of crushed rock, located on a four lane highway substantially constructed but not then completed nor opened for public travel, resulting from alleged negligence of the appellants as contractors in charge of the construction, in failing to establish lights, signs and barricades to warn the public from traveling on said highway and of the existence of the stock pile. Respondents…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. McAfee v. Travis Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Fleenor v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Otts v. BroughIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Mendenhall v. MacGregor Triangle CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Dewey v. KellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Galarowicz v. WARDUtah Supreme Court · 1951

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API