Wetmore v. Barrett
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. ' - The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. ■
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This action was brought to recover moneys paid to brokers in consideration of purchases .of mining stock on margins. Most of the points raised are precisely those which were considered in Cashman v. Root, 89 Cal. 373; 23 Am. St. .Rep. 482; As.we are entirely satisfied with the conclusion there reached, it is not necessary to go over the matter again. Defendants had printed the ternas and conditions upon which they were doing business, and required plaintiff’s agent to agree to them. Those printed terms show that the transactions upon which the money was paid w'ere purchases of stock…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cashman v. RootCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Baldwin v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Kullman v. SimmensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Stillwell v. CutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905