Legal Opinion
George J. Birkel Co. v. Howze
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1910No. Civ. No. 750PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
The complaint filed by plaintiff sets out a written instrument in the words and figures following:
“Sept. 1st, 1906.
“George J. Birkel Company,
“Los Angeles, Calif.
“For value received, we herewith hand you twenty-five (25) shares of Mount Washington Company stock certificates No. 60, 61, 64, at a total value of twenty-five hundred ($2500) dollars.
“We agree, at the expiration of one (1) year from date, on demand, to purchase said stock for twenty-five hundred dollars, with interest added at six per cent, per annum from date.
“(Signed) JNO. HOWZE.
“ROBERT MARSH.
“J. E. MARSH.”
It is averred that on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cashman v. RootCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Gay v. DareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Baldwin v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Kullman v. SimmensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hardenburgh v. HardenburghMontana Supreme Court · 1944
- Thacker v. American FoundryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Santa Clara Properties Co. v. R. L. C., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Vagim v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Schutz Foss Architects v. CampbellMontana Supreme Court · 1990