Legal Opinion

Holt v. Lucas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1908No. 15,507PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Shawnee district court; Alston W. Dana, judge..

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

F. H. Holt brought an action in replevin to ^recover ten hogs, valued at $150, and eleven calves, valued at $55. His right to the possession of the property rests upon a chattel mortgage given by Louis H. Wiggin, dated April 5, 1904. Defendant F. P. Dickson claims the property by virtue of an attachment levied thereon by the sheriff of Shawnee county subsequent to the date of plaintiff’s mortgage.

The controversy is over the increase of the stock *711described in the mortgage. The mortgage includes seven brood-sows, nine cows and. heifers, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Kellogg v. LovelyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Forman v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
  4. Corbin v. KincaidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. First National Bank v. McIntosh & Peters Live-stock & Commission Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Danville State Bank v. MaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Beall v. SpearSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. International Harvester Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Peterson v. Citizens BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Wyatt v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API