Legal Opinion

Young v. Burchill

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1929No. Docket No. 6523PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Appeal from a decree refusing to enjoin the sale of certain real property under a deed of trust. There is no dispute as to the facts. Plaintiffs and appellants were the owners of the real property here involved. On November 28, 1925, they executed to defendants Burchill and wife two promissory notes, one for the sum of $4,000 and the other for $500. Both notes carried interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum. The $4,000 note was, by its terms, payable in monthly installments of $45 commencing on December 28, 1925, and the $500 note was payable in the sum of $50 per month commencing on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Clemens v. LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Myers v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Whitcher v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. McCue v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Harris v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Johnston v. AustinUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Righetti v. Monroe, Lyon & Miller, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API