Legal Opinion

Righetti v. Monroe, Lyon & Miller, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1930No. Docket No. 7364PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

The plaintiff brought this action upon a promissory note executed in his favor by the defendant corporation. Plaintiff obtained judgment upon a trial by the court sitting without a jury and defendant appeals.

The note in the sum of $10,000 was executed in 1926. Interest on the note was payable monthly, together with installments of not less than $200 on the principal. The note contained the following provision: “And it is further agreed that in case of default in the payment of said interest for a period of ten days after the same shall become due, and demand having been made therefor, then…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Young v. BurchillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Jump v. BarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Harris v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Turney v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Tyner v. AxtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Ingram v. MandlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API