Righetti v. Monroe, Lyon & Miller, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
The plaintiff brought this action upon a promissory note executed in his favor by the defendant corporation. Plaintiff obtained judgment upon a trial by the court sitting without a jury and defendant appeals.
The note in the sum of $10,000 was executed in 1926. Interest on the note was payable monthly, together with installments of not less than $200 on the principal. The note contained the following provision: “And it is further agreed that in case of default in the payment of said interest for a period of ten days after the same shall become due, and demand having been made therefor, then…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dunn v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Young v. BurchillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Jump v. BarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Harris v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Turney v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Tyner v. AxtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Ingram v. MandlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932