Legal Opinion

Harris v. Kessler

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1932No. Docket No. 7501PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendant declined to amend his answer and cross-complaint, after demurrers thereto had been sustained with leave to amend, and thereupon judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint. Subsequently defendant moved to vacate the judgment upon the ground that by reason of certain denials in the answer the cause was at issue when the judgment was entered. The motion was denied; whereupon defendant appealed from the judgment and the order denying his motion to vacate.

The action involved the alleged breach of a conditional sales contract for the sale and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durst v. JollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Young v. BurchillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Righetti v. Monroe, Lyon & Miller, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hays v. TempleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Henderson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API