McCue v. Bradbury
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. T. C. Kierulff, E. C. Chapman, and R. M. F. Soto, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHen Shaw, J.
Plaintiffs had executed to trustees a deed of trust in the usual form as security for moneys advanced by defendant William B. Bradbury. The trustees, having declared a default and forfeiture under the terms of the trust, were proceeding to sell the lands, when plaintiffs .instituted this action to restrain them, and to compel the defendant Bradbury to accept in extinguishment of their debt to him the moneys due and evidenced by certificates of deposit issued by a bank in San Rafael, Marin County, in which county the land is situated. The history of the transactions and dealings of the parties…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Noyes v. ClarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
- Wilcox v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Bennett v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Adams v. RutherfordOregon Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schweiger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Abstract Investment Co. v. HutchinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Strom v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.