Legal Opinion
Wax 'N Works v. City of St. Paul
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 26, 2000No. 99-1152PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Wax ’n Works appeals an order of the district court 1 that denied attorney’s fees after the court dismissed, for failure to state a claim, both counts in a lawsuit brought by Wax ’n Works. We affirm.
I
In mid-1977, the city of St. Paul, Minnesota, exercised its power of eminent domain, see Minn.Stat.Ann. §§ 117.011-117.57, with respect to the property where Wax ’n Works, a car detailing business, was located. Wax ’n Works moved to another location two weeks later and subsequently submitted an application, and then an amended application six weeks later, for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- William St. Clair John Shelton v. City of Chico County of ButteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Brady v. Town of ColchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Elmer Pace and Linda Pace v. City of Des Moines, Iowa, and Brian DannerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Arlena Kelly v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Crooks v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Residential Funding Company v. Terrace Mortgage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Keating v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Antonnette Hopkins v. The City of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.