Legal Opinion

Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Richfield v. Wren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 28, 2005No. A04-207PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Appellant Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) appeals from an administrative order directing it to pay relocation benefits to respondent Kenneth Wren pursuant to the Minnesota Uniform Relocation Act (MURA), Minn.Stat. §§ 117.50-117.56 (2002). The HRA contends that it should not be liable to pay the benefits because it contracted with a private developer to negotiate with Wren for the purchase of his home. The Administrative Law Judge concluded that the HRA had “undertaken acquisition” of Wren’s property within the meaning of *760MURA and held that Wren was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
Young v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
Gilliland v. PORT AUTH. OF CITY OF ST. PAULSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

In Re WrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005