Legal Opinion
In Re Wren
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 7, 2004No. A04-207PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT H. SCHUMACHER, Judge.
On appeal by writ of certiorari in this relocation-benefits dispute, the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) argues that an administrative law judge (ALJ) erred by concluding that respondent Kenneth Wren is entitled to relocation benefits under the Minnesota Uniform Relocation Act. We affirm.
FACTS
The 7600 block of Lyndale Avenue South was first identified for redevelopment in 1985 by consultants working for the HRA. In 1999, the HRA approved a contract with CSM Properties, Inc. to redevelop the area. Wren had recently purchased a home in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Houston v. International Data Transfer Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Brandt v. Hallwood Management Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Fiveland v. Bollig & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re WrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Richfield v. WrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Instant Testing Co. v. Community Security BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006