Legal Opinion
Jensen Field Relocation Claims Jensen Field, Inc. v. Board of Regents
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 25, 2012No. A11-1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*727OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
In this certiorari appeal, involving a dispute about whether relators-tenants are eligible for relocation benefits under the URA, relators argue that (1) the use by respondent-landlord of one of its vice presidents to serve as the hearing officer violated Minn.Stat. §§ 117.012, subd. 1, 117.52, subd. 4; (2) they are displaced persons and therefore entitled to relocation benefits under the URA; (3) the hearing officer erred by concurrently determining their eligibility for and the amount of relocation benefits; and (4) the hearing officer erred by denying them…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Audrey Tullock v. State Highway Commission of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Regional Transportation District v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alan Josephsen Co., Inc. v. Village of MundeleinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2024
- in Re $55,336.17 Surplus FundsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017